[ad_1]
A break up Supreme Court docket for the state of Washington issued a divided opinion final week, with the bulk holding {that a} college’s obligation to guard its college students from foreseeable harm by the hands of different college students solely pertains to the confines of its campus or college sponsored and managed occasions and will depend on the scholar’s enrollment and presence on campus.
The 5-3 court docket answered two licensed questions from the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit associated to a negligence go well with plaintiff Madeleine Barlow introduced in opposition to Washington State College after a fellow WSU pupil, Thomas Culhane, raped her at a celebration at his off-campus residence.
[ad_2]
Source link