[ad_1]
Vinod Bhandari v. State of Madhya Pradesh(2015) 1 SCC 502 : (2015) 4 SCC (Cri) 480In the Supreme Court docket of IndiaCrl. App. 220/2015Before Justice T.S. Thakur and Justice A.Ok. GoelDecided on February 04, 2015
Relevancy of the Case: Bail utility for the involvement within the notorious Vyapam rip-off
Statutes and Provisions Concerned
The Data Know-how Act, 2000 (Part 65, 66)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Part 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471)
The Code of Prison Process, 1973 (Part 437, 439(1))
Related Details of the Case
The appellant is among the accused within the notorious Vyapam rip-off in Madhya Pradesh. He allegedly conspired with a number of people to assist undeserving medical college students go the doorway examination for MBBS admissions.
The appellant utilized for bail earlier than the trial courtroom and the Excessive Court docket. Nevertheless, the courts rejected the bail utility, citing the explanation of seriousness of the offence.
The custody of the applicant was extended for a yr. Subsequently, he offered an utility for bail earlier than this courtroom.
Outstanding Arguments by the Advocates
The applicant’s counsel argued that the trial has been extended for a yr, and there’s nonetheless no scope for the trial to begin in future. Subsequently, the courtroom ought to take into account granting bail to the applicant.
Opinion of the Bench
The detailed investigation of the proof must be averted whereas contemplating the query of bail. That is to make sure no prejudice on the case’s deserves.
It’s the obligation of the prosecution and the courtroom to expedite the trial. Speedy trial is a proper of the accused and can be within the curiosity of justice.
If the circumstances point out {that a} grant of bail would affect the trial, the courtroom mustn’t permit the bail utility.
Closing Choice
The bench rejected the bail utility.
[ad_2]
Source link
