[ad_1]
To the Editor:
Re “Trump Continues to Roll With Win in New Hampshire” (entrance web page, Jan. 24):
I believed for a fleeting second Tuesday night time when the New Hampshire Republican major outcomes started to return in that these amongst us who’re disgusted by the considered a candidate who offers the looks of a modern-style fascist, praises the likes of Viktor Orban and now’s even shedding grip on his psychological acuity may be joined by main factions of the Republican Occasion.
However with the first over, it seems that this isn’t true. Donald Trump made positive aspects even amongst suburban Republicans. This seems to be who the celebration is now and who they need to symbolize them.
The soul of American democracy has by no means been in a lot jeopardy, and people of us who need to put it aside have our work lower out for us.
Larry LobertGrosse Pointe Park, Mich.
To the Editor:
The takeaway from the New Hampshire major just isn’t that Nikki Haley can’t win the Republican nomination. We knew that already, in addition to that the Republican Occasion has been hijacked by Donald Trump and his MAGA supporters, with G.O.P. moderates quickly, if not completely, sidelined.
What Ms. Haley’s robust displaying demonstrated, nevertheless, is that New Hampshire will vote for Joe Biden in November, and that independents, in giant numbers, will favor Mr. Biden over Mr. Trump. One motive that Mr. Trump is so desirous to push Ms. Haley off the sector is that she is, successfully, organizing Independents for Biden.
Mr. Biden’s highway to victory can be primarily via independents in purple states and, to some extent, reasonable Republicans who would slightly have a reasonable Democrat within the White Home than one other chaotic trip with Mr. Trump. If earlier than Ms. Haley’s candidacy Democrats didn’t know whom to focus on, they know now: middle-class, educated, unbiased voters in city communities.
New Hampshire confirmed us who and the place they’re, and how you can win their votes.
Rita C. TobinChappaqua, N.Y.
To the Editor:
I understand that Donald Trump is the odds-on favourite to win the Republican Occasion presidential nomination. Barring some unexpected circumstances, that would be the case. Nonetheless, if I’m Nikki Haley I’m not quitting the race. As of this writing, Mr. Trump has 12 delegates and Ms. Haley has 9 out of New Hampshire. Her marketing campaign has legs.
For the lifetime of me, I’ll by no means perceive why Mr. Trump will get the assist he will get, however I don’t have to know. It’s not hyperbole to say that the state of American democracy might effectively relaxation on who wins the election.
So, run, Nikki, run. Donald Trump merely needs to be defeated this yr.
Bruce NeumanWater Mill, N.Y.
To the Editor:
If Nikki Haley actually needs to be president, she ought to keep within the race all the best way to the vote on the Republican conference, whatever the ends in New Hampshire or South Carolina or elsewhere. Why? As a result of she’s going to proceed to win delegates wherever she campaigns.
If Donald Trump is convicted on any of his 4 legal circumstances earlier than the 2024 election, the Republicans would possibly simply bail on him. In the event that they do, their greatest go-to candidate could be the one credible candidate to get actual votes on the conference, on this case Ms. Haley. However provided that she stays the course.
As a Biden Democrat I’d not welcome that strategy by Ms. Haley as a result of she simply would possibly beat my very own candidate.
Charles FelsKnoxville, Tenn.
A Conflict of Views Over the U.S. and Israel
To the Editor:
Re “Israel Rebuffs Calls to Work on Statehood for Palestine” (information article, Jan. 19):
Having constantly publicly pressed Israel to restrict its army marketing campaign in Gaza, the Biden administration has now turned to a brand new demand: pressuring Israel to conform to the creation of a Palestinian state, which President Biden describes as the one viable long-term answer.
Viable answer? Hamas has all the time made clear that its objective is to create just one state — not together with Israel. And whereas the Palestinian Authority has, at instances, given lip service to a “two-state answer,” it has all the time insisted that it embrace the return of a whole bunch of hundreds of Palestinians to Israel, in the end turning the Jews right into a minority and destroying Israel as a Jewish state.
It’s time for the U.S. to cease urging Israel to conform to a “answer” that will sow the seeds of its self-destruction.
Kenneth A. MargolisChappaqua, N.Y.
To the Editor:
Beneath the protect of america’ unconditional assist for Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pursued insurance policies that violate every little thing we all know as justice — the advantage on the coronary heart of our spiritual and civic regulation and foundational to each our nations.
Mr. Netanyahu’s extremism is matched by his truculence. When he rebuffs calls to work towards sovereign Israeli and Palestinian states with “What are you able to do?,” for this American Jew and Zionist, the reply is evident: Instantly cut back U.S. army help to Israel.
Annlinn KrugerBar Harbor, Maine
Freedom of Speech
To the Editor:
Re “When States Attempt to Prohibit Individuals’ Speech” (editorial, Jan. 21):
A cornerstone of America is its dedication to the impartial ideas and values of free speech and expression. The federal government can not choose and select these views it approves, and reject or prohibit these views it disapproves.
Your editorial serves a precious function in alerting readers to the latest erosion of this fundamental freedom.
Whether or not the difficulty is requiring a pledge to not boycott Israel, limiting a instructor’s proper to discuss race or sexual id points, or requiring a brand new worker to signal a press release supporting range, fairness and inclusion ideas, the First Modification ensures the fitting to talk freely, with just a few exceptions, with out the concern of censorship or punishment by the federal government.
Traditionally, the battle to realize freedom, justice and equality has trusted the fitting to free speech. The latest effort to devalue the ideas of the First Modification is a disturbing signal of the instances that must be carefully monitored and, the place mandatory, challenged. In any other case, America and its residents lose one thing elementary and particular.
Norman SiegelNew YorkThe author is a civil rights lawyer and a former govt director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.
To the Editor:
Re “When You Return These Pants, the Planet Pays,” by Pamela Paul (column, Jan. 12):
It’s unhappy (and fairly shameful) that on-line retailers discover it extra handy and cheaper to ship returned gadgets to the landfill, slightly than donate them to those that might use them. Are the retailers not conscious that there are millions of charitable organizations all through the nation that will gladly settle for these things?
Each municipality of first rate measurement has a Goodwill retailer, or an equal thrift store run by native church buildings or different benevolent associations. Many of those will gladly come and choose up the donations. To these retailers, please be extra accountable company residents!
Invoice FryMilwaukee
[ad_2]
Source link
