[ad_1]
Sarojkumar Mahendra Singh v. State of MaharashtraIn the Excessive Court docket of BombayB.A. 3075/2019Before Justice S.Okay. ShindeDecided on January 07, 2020
Relevancy of the Case: Bail utility in a case involving fraudulent switch of cash from the complainant’s account
Statutes and Provisions Concerned
The Data Expertise Act, 2000 (Part 66C, 66D)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Part 34, 420)
Related Details of the Case
The applicant had allegedly siphoned off the complainant’s cash from their portal. The complainant used the portal to switch cash to its retailers.
The authorities seized the applicant’s cell handset with a number of SIM playing cards. In addition they recovered a sum of the full quantity, which was transferred to varied individuals.
The applicant was in custody and introduced the bail utility earlier than this courtroom.
Outstanding Arguments by the Advocates
The applicant’s counsel argued that there are not any prison antecedents towards the applicant. The investigation can be over, and subsequently, there isn’t any want for custodial interrogation.
Opinion of the Bench
The offences are punishable by imprisonment of no more than seven years, and the applicant’s presence could be ensured by imposing situations.
Subsequently, the courtroom leaned in favour of granting the bail to the applicant.
Last Resolution
The courtroom allowed the bail utility.
[ad_2]
Source link
