Baliram Shivaji Ghante v. State of Maharashtra

Baliram Shivaji Ghante v. State of MaharashtraIn the Excessive Courtroom of BombayCrl. B.A. 2953/2021Before Justice N.W. SambreDecided on September 28, 2021

Relevancy of the Case: Bail software in a case the place the police discovered 4 cell phones within the possession of the accused with a felony historical past

Statutes and Provisions Concerned

The Data Expertise Act, 2000 (Part 65)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Part 420, 467, 468, 472)
The Public Playing Act, 1867 (Part 4, 5)

Related Information of the Case

The police discovered the applicant with 4 cell phones and has felony historical past.

Outstanding Arguments by the Advocates

The applicant’s counsel argued that neither forgery nor any materials for hacking was established from the current prices. Dishonest and playing can’t coexist on the identical time. The obtainable materials doesn’t exhibit how the petitioner has violated the Data Expertise Act, 2000.
The respondent’s counsel submitted that the applicant was present in possession of 4 cell phones and has felony antecedents.

Opinion of the Bench

The court docket has already granted bail to the co-accused working with the applicant. There isn’t any proof obtainable to justify the accusation in opposition to the applicant. Furthermore, the obtainable file doesn’t infer a declare of forgery or dishonest.

Ultimate Determination

The court docket allowed the bail software with situations.

Yagyanseni Acharya, an undergraduate scholar at VIT College of Legislation, Chennai, ready this case abstract throughout her internship with The Cyber Weblog India in January/February 2024.